Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 52
Filter
1.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 43(3): 239-245, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2313996

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: A recent article in this journal presented a US perspective regarding the modernization of clozapine prescription and proposed an escape from the long shadow cast by agranulocytosis. METHODS: Here, an international group of collaborators discusses a point of view complementary to the US view by focusing on worldwide outcomes of clozapine usage that may be uneven in terms of frequency of clozapine adverse drug reactions. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Studies from the Scandinavian national registries (Finland and Denmark) did not find increased mortality in clozapine patients or any clear evidence of the alleged toxicity of clozapine. Data on clozapine-associated fatal outcomes were obtained from 2 recently published pharmacovigilance studies and from the UK pharmacovigilance database. A pharmacovigilance study focused on physician reports to assess worldwide lethality of drugs from 2010 to 2019 found 968 clozapine-associated fatal outcomes in the United Kingdom. Moreover, the United Kingdom accounted for 55% (968 of 1761) of worldwide and 90% (968 of 1073) of European fatal clozapine-associated outcomes. In a pharmacovigilance study from the UK database (from 2008 to 2017), clozapine was associated with 383 fatal outcomes/year including all reports from physicians and nonphysicians. From 2018 to 2021, UK clozapine-associated fatal outcomes increased to 440/year. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: The interpretation of fatal outcomes in each country using pharmacovigilance databases is limited and only allows gross comparisons; even with those limitations, the UK data seem concerning. Pneumonia and myocarditis may be more important than agranulocytosis in explaining the uneven distribution of fatal outcomes in clozapine patients across countries.


Subject(s)
Agranulocytosis , Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Humans , Clozapine/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Pharmacovigilance , Agranulocytosis/chemically induced , United Kingdom
2.
Pharmacol Res Perspect ; 11(2): e01074, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2304719

ABSTRACT

The antioxidant L-Carnosine is reported to improve negative and cognitive symptoms in Schizophrenia. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study was planned to study the effectiveness of adjuvant L-Carnosine therapy in patients with Schizophrenia. 100 eligible patients with predominant negative symptoms as measured by scale for assessment of negative symptoms (SANS total score ≥ 60) and Schizophrenia diagnosis (International Classification of Disorder-Tenth Edition, ICD-10) were recruited. They were randomly allocated to receive a fixed dose of either 400 mg L-Carnosine or identical placebo for 3 months and increased to 800 mg from 13th week till completion of study. Primary outcome measures assessed changes in SANS scores with L-Carnosine at 24 weeks compared to baseline, 4 and 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measures were done to assess the improvement in cognitive symptoms (executive function, attention, and memory) at 24 weeks using subtests of NIMHANS (National Institute for Mental Health and Neurosciences) cognitive battery. Side effects were assessed using adverse events reporting form. The attention scores (p = .023) showed significant differences in patients receiving 800 mg of L-Carnosine at the end of the study. There were no significant differences in negative symptoms in the two arms at study completion. L-Carnosine dosing of 800 mg may be a promising agent to enhance executive functions in Schizophrenia.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Carnosine , Schizophrenia , Humans , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Schizophrenia/chemically induced , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Carnosine/therapeutic use , Carnosine/pharmacology , Treatment Outcome , Cognition
8.
Am J Ther ; 29(5): e544-e552, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1909034

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is the only approved antipsychotic for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Despite its therapeutic benefits, it is still widely underused, mainly because of its potential to cause agranulocytosis and neutropenia. Prescribing clozapine in COVID-19-positive patients became more challenging because of this potential side effect. This article is a review of literature on the risk of neutropenia associated with clozapine treatment in patients with COVID-19. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: In clozapine-treated COVID-19-positive patients, neutropenia was reported in some cases; is it a consequence of clozapine treatment or of SARS-Co2 infection? DATA SOURCES: Data were extracted from 2 databases: PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar. We selected all original reports, from March 2020 until May 2022, on neutropenia associated with clozapine treatment in positive COVID-19 patients. Eleven studies were selected for the final analysis. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: Before the COVID-19 pandemic, neutropenia in clozapine-treated patients was reported in 3.8% of cases. During the pandemic, neutropenia rates seemed to be higher. As per the cause of neutropenia, studies reported contradictory results. We aim to clarify rates and causes of neutropenia in clozapine-treated COVID-19-positive patients. RESULTS: Three hundred eighty-eight articles were initially selected from the 2 databases. After excluding duplicates, unrelated articles, reviews, and guidelines, 11 studies were analyzed, all centered on clozapine treatment, COVID-19 infection, and associated neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine treatment in COVID-19-positive patients may be associated with a transient reduction of absolute neutrophils count, in some cases reaching neutropenia levels. Neutropenia rates reported in SARS-CoV-2-infected patients are higher than the prepandemic reports; therefore, we assume that the cause might be a result of the immunological interference between clozapine and SARS-CoV-2. Clozapine treatment needs to be continued whenever possible, with dose adjustments in relation to blood test results.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Clozapine , Neutropenia , Schizophrenia , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Clozapine/adverse effects , Humans , Neutropenia/chemically induced , Neutropenia/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Schizophrenia/drug therapy
9.
Clin Neuropharmacol ; 45(4): 95-98, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1891237

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Clozapine is an effective antipsychotic for Parkinson's disease (PD) that does not worsen motor function and can improve tremor. It is approved for PD psychosis in Europe and Australia. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report on the use of clozapine in a movement disorder clinic. METHODS: We report on patients monitored during the COVID-19 pandemic in clinic over a 7-month period. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were seen, of whom 50 had PD. Thirty-one were treated for psychosis, 18 for refractory tremor and 1 for levodopa dyskinesias. The remainder had psychotic symptoms with dementia with Lewy bodies (n = 2) or other movement disorders. Four had clozapine discontinued because of sedation and 1 for agranulocytosis. Three had clozapine temporarily halted because of granulocytopenia but were rechallenged successfully. CONCLUSIONS: When comparing clozapine use in this clinic as compared with others, we deduce that clozapine is likely significantly underutilized in the United States.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Clozapine , Parkinson Disease , Psychotic Disorders , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Clozapine/adverse effects , Humans , Pandemics , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/etiology , Tremor/drug therapy
11.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(5): e2210743, 2022 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1825762

ABSTRACT

Importance: Individuals with serious mental illness are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection. Several psychotropic medications have been identified as potential therapeutic agents to prevent or treat COVID-19 but have not been systematically examined in this population. Objective: To evaluate the associations between the use of psychotropic medications and the risk of COVID-19 infection among adults with serious mental illness receiving long-term inpatient psychiatric treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study assessed adults with serious mental illness hospitalized in a statewide psychiatric hospital system in New York between March 8 and July 1, 2020. The final date of follow-up was December 1, 2020. The study included 1958 consecutive adult inpatients with serious mental illness (affective or nonaffective psychoses) who received testing for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction or antinucleocapsid antibodies and were continuously hospitalized from March 8 until medical discharge or July 1, 2020. Exposures: Psychotropic medications prescribed prior to COVID-19 testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: COVID-19 infection was the primary outcome, defined by a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction or antibody test result. The secondary outcome was COVID-19-related death among patients with laboratory-confirmed infection. Results: Of the 2087 adult inpatients with serious mental illness continuously hospitalized during the study period, 1958 (93.8%) underwent testing and were included in the study; 1442 (73.6%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 51.4 (14.3) years. A total of 969 patients (49.5%) had laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection that occurred while they were hospitalized; of those, 38 (3.9%) died. The use of second-generation antipsychotic medications, as a class, was associated with decreased odds of infection (odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.86), whereas the use of mood stabilizers was associated with increased odds of infection (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.47). In a multivariable model of individual medications, the use of paliperidone was associated with decreased odds of infection (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.84), and the use of valproic acid was associated with increased odds of infection (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10-1.76). Clozapine use was associated with reduced odds of mortality in unadjusted analyses (unadjusted OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.10-0.62; fully adjusted OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.17-1.12). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of adults hospitalized with serious mental illness, the use of second-generation antipsychotic medications was associated with decreased risk of COVID-19 infection, whereas the use of valproic acid was associated with increased risk. Further research is needed to assess the mechanisms that underlie these findings.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , COVID-19 , Mental Disorders , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Humans , Inpatients , Male , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , New York/epidemiology , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Valproic Acid
12.
Acta Psychiatr Scand ; 146(2): 168-178, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1759138

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients on clozapine as regards plasma clozapine concentration and haematological parameters. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre observational cohort study from 22 February 2021 to 2 September 2021. Primary outcomes were clinically relevant increase in clozapine blood levels (>100 µg/L increase compared to baseline) and clozapine alert levels (>1000 µg/L). Secondary outcomes were granulocytopenia, leukocytopenia and lymphocytopenia. Outcomes were measured approximately 5 days after the first and (where applicable) second dose of COVID-19 vaccine. RESULTS: This study included 139 patients. Compared to baseline, clozapine blood levels increased significantly (ES = 0.28, p = 0.003) after the second vaccination. Clinically relevant increases in clozapine blood levels occurred in 20/92 patients (22%) and in 16/56 patients (29%) during the first and second phases, respectively. Clozapine alert levels developed in one patient (1%) following the first dose and in three patients (5%) after the second dose. In both phases, changes in white blood cells (WBC) were limited to mild granulocytopenia (3% and 5%), moderate granulocytopenia (1% and 0%) and leukocytopenia (2% and 3%) without cause for extra monitoring according to the guideline. CONCLUSION: In general, as regards WBC counts COVID-19 vaccination seems to be safe in patients with SMI. Changes in WBC had no clinical implications. Psychoeducation on the symptoms of clozapine intoxication is recommended, especially in patients with clozapine blood levels approaching the upper limit of the therapeutic range. Increase in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level can signal inflammation rapidly and help to prevent clozapine intoxication following vaccination.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Clozapine , Leukopenia , Agranulocytosis/chemically induced , Agranulocytosis/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/blood , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Clozapine/adverse effects , Clozapine/blood , Cohort Studies , Humans , Leukocytes , Leukopenia/chemically induced , Leukopenia/drug therapy , Vaccination
13.
Hum Psychopharmacol ; 37(5): e2842, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1750374

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tiapride is an atypical antipsychotic used to treat alcohol withdrawal, aggressiveness and agitation, headache, dyskinesias, tic and Tourette's disorder. More recently, it has been proposed for the treatment of delirium and agitation in hospitalised patients with COVID-19. Although its safety profile makes it suitable for use in vulnerable populations, the use of tiapride for psychiatric disorders is limited. This work aims to systematically review the available evidence on the efficacy and tolerability of tiapride in individuals with a psychiatric disorder. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, GreyLit, OpenGrey, and ProQuest up to March 2020 for randomised controlled trials focussing on the use of tiapride in the treatment of individuals with a psychiatric disorder (e.g., mood disorder, schizophrenia spectrum, substance use disorder). The Risk of Bias 2 was performed for the quality assessment of the included studies. RESULTS: We identified 579 records. Of them, six studies (published between 1982 and 2010) were included in the review. Four studies referred to alcohol withdrawal, and two to the management of agitation in elderly patients with dementia. None of the studies reported significant differences between tiapride and other active comparators in terms of efficacy and tolerability. The overall risk of bias was moderate to high. CONCLUSION: Tiapride may be considered as a relatively safe treatment option for selected patients with alcohol withdrawal or agitation in dementia. However, solid evidence of its efficacy in the scientific literature is lacking. High-quality trials remain necessary to fully sustain its use in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Alcoholism , Antipsychotic Agents , COVID-19 , Dementia , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome , Aged , Alcoholism/drug therapy , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Dementia/chemically induced , Dementia/drug therapy , Dementia/psychology , Humans , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/drug therapy , Tiapride Hydrochloride/therapeutic use
14.
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova ; 122(1. Vyp. 2): 13-19, 2022.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1727029

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze clinical and therapeutic features of the transfer of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders from paliperidone palmitate of one-month action (PP-1M) to paliperidone of three-month action (PP-3M). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data on the psychopharmacological therapy regimens of 677 patients with verified diagnoses of schizophrenia spectrum disorders (F20, F21, F25) treated with PP-3M drugs after PP-1M therapy were studied. RESULTS: The study showed the high efficacy of ultra-long-acting paliperidone therapy in 82.2% of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. The unfavorable dynamics of the mental state in patients when transferring from the drug PP-1M to PP-3M was 14.0%, the return to therapy with PP-1M or tablet forms was 3.8%. Successful management of patients on PP-3M was not associated with sex and age, but was correlated with some clinical and therapeutic indicators. The most successful therapy with PP-3M was noted with the earlier appointment of PP-3M mainly as monotherapy, provided the previous stable condition on shorter-acting paliperidone preparations (including tablet forms). Predictors of a favorable prognosis of PP-3M therapy are also diagnostic categories such as paranoid schizophrenia, episodic type of course with increasing or stable personality changes and pronounced affective disorders in the structure of the clinical picture of the disease. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate the high efficacy of PP-3M and its significant rehabilitation potential, which allows improving the quality of life and social functioning of patients, as well as optimizing the provision of psychiatric care to this contingent of patients, which is of particular importance in the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , COVID-19 , Schizophrenia , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Delayed-Action Preparations/therapeutic use , Humans , Paliperidone Palmitate/therapeutic use , Pandemics , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2 , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
15.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 56: 92-99, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1648886

ABSTRACT

Clozapine, an antipsychotic, is associated with increased susceptibility to infection with COVID-19, compared to other antipsychotics. Here, we investigate associations between clozapine treatment and increased risk of adverse outcomes of COVID-19, namely COVID-related hospitalisation, intensive care treatment, and death, amongst patients taking antipsychotics with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Using the clinical records of South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, we identified 157 individuals who had an ICD-10 diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, were taking antipsychotics (clozapine or other antipsychotics) at the time of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK and had a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection. The following health outcomes were measured: COVID-related hospitalisation, COVID-related intensive care treatment and death. We tested associations between clozapine treatment and each outcome using logistic regression models, adjusting for gender, age, ethnicity, neighbourhood deprivation, obesity, smoking status, diabetes, asthma, bronchitis and hypertension using propensity scores. Of the 157 individuals who developed COVID-19 while on antipsychotics (clozapine or other antipsychotics), there were 28% COVID-related hospitalisations, 8% COVID-related intensive care treatments and 8% deaths of any cause during the 28 days follow-up period. amongst those taking clozapine, there were 25% COVID-related hospitalisations, 7% COVID-related intensive care treatments and 7% deaths. In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, we found no significant association between clozapine and any of the outcomes. Thus, we found no evidence that patients with clozapine treatment at time of COVID-19 infection had increased risk of hospitalisation, intensive care treatment or death, compared to non-clozapine antipsychotic-treated patients. However, further research should be considered in larger samples to confirm this.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , COVID-19 , Clozapine , Psychotic Disorders , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Clozapine/adverse effects , Critical Care , Hospitalization , Humans , Pandemics , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(21)2021 10 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1488556

ABSTRACT

Despite its severe adverse effects, such as agranulocytosis, clozapine is the primary treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The established clozapine monitoring system has contributed to reducing agranulocytosis incidence and mortality rates. However, the pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused changes in the monitoring system. This review aimed to assess the current evidence on the neutrophil changes in the patient on clozapine treatment and infected with COVID-19. Individual cases reported various absolute neutrophil count (ANC) levels, normal, reduced, or elevated. No agranulocytosis case was reported. One case had a borderline moderate-severe ANC level, but the patient was in the 18-week period of clozapine treatment. A cumulative analysis of case the series initially reported inconclusive results. However, a more recent study with a larger sample size reported a significant reduction in the ANC during COVID-19 infection. Nevertheless, this effect is transient as no significant difference was found between the baseline and the post-infection period in ANC levels. In conclusion, COVID-19 is associated with a temporary reduction in ANC levels. The results supported the recommendation to reduce the frequency of clozapine monitoring in the eligible candidates. However, more data are required to confirm the current findings given the limitations, including study design, sample size, and statistical analysis.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , COVID-19 , Clozapine , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Clozapine/adverse effects , Humans , Leukocyte Count , Neutrophils , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL